The UFT worked with the DOE to revise the teacher evaluation system so it not only aligns with the new state law, but it’s also fairer and reduces the impact of standardized tests. And we’re proud that we’ve worked toward creating more authentic student learning measures.

See the UFT’s guide to the teacher evaluation system (2017–18) »

Do you have concerns about your final rating for the 2016–17 school year?

Fill out the Final Ratings Issues form »

The Matrix

You will receive a HEDI rating for both your Measures of Teacher Practice (MOTP) and Measures of Student Learning (MOSL) subcomponents. Then the DOE will use a matrix to determine your final rating. The matrix, which is shown below, makes it easy to determine your final rating. Just find the square where your MOSL rating and your MOTP rating intersect and that’s your rating. For example, if you receive an Effective in MOSL and a Developing in MOTP, your overall rating will be Effective. In general, the final rating focuses on each teacher’s strengths, and holds teachers accountable in a common-sense, consistent way.

MOTP Chart Matrix Evaluation

Learn more

DOE guidance

Measures of Student Learning Selection Guide (2017–18)

This guide is intended to support schools in making thoughtful MOSL selections that are aligned to student needs, instructional priorities and strategic assessment plans to drive improvements in student learning.

Advance Educator Guide (2017–18)

This DOE guide explains the key features of the teacher evaluation and development system.

Draft proposal:

2 observations like the rest of New York State public schools. Comment below.